Politician · concept

Jeremy Corbyn on Royal Family

Skeptical of institution (strong)

TL;DR

Jeremy Corbyn believes the size of the Royal Family should be reduced, viewing hereditary titles as undemocratic.

Key Points

  • He suggested the Royal Family should be scaled back regarding its size and activities following the Prince Andrew scandal in late 2019.

  • He has stated on social media that he does not believe in inherited titles such as dukedoms, favouring democracy instead.

  • He expressed concern over media coverage with perceived racial undertones directed at the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

Summary

Jeremy Corbyn has expressed skepticism regarding the continued existence and scale of the British monarchy, fundamentally aligning with republican views. He has specifically cited the size of the Royal Family, suggesting it should be scaled back, particularly in light of scandals involving members. Furthermore, he explicitly rejects the principle of hereditary power, stating his belief in democracy over inherited status like dukedoms.

This position is framed by a broader context of concern for media treatment of certain royal family members and a commitment to republican ideals. While not demanding immediate abolition, his comments consistently suggest reform towards a more democratic structure, contrasting with the traditional, uncritical deference often shown by mainstream politicians to the institution.

Key Quotes

I don't believe in dukedoms

The monarchy has to change

Frequently Asked Questions

Jeremy Corbyn holds a skeptical position regarding the monarchy, advocating for significant reform, particularly reducing the size of the Royal Family. He has openly stated his opposition to hereditary privilege, such as dukedoms, in favour of democratic principles.

While his stance is strongly republican, suggesting the monarchy 'has to change,' his stated focus has often been on practical changes like reducing the number of royals. He frames his view as preferring democracy over inherited status.

The politician cited the size of the Royal Family and their activities as an area for improvement when discussing changes to the institution. This comment was made publicly in the context of scrutiny over Prince Andrew's role.