Politician · concept

Kathy Hochul on Veto

Selective Veto Use (strong)

TL;DR

Kathy Hochul frequently uses the veto power to reject legislation she believes imposes undue financial burdens or conflicts with federal law.

Key Points

  • She vetoed a bill aimed at broadening the New York LLC Transparency Act beyond foreign-formed entities on December 19, 2025, citing federal alignment.

  • The governor rejected two key EMS support measures, including one allowing funding outside the property tax cap, citing concerns over higher property taxes, in late 2025.

  • Her veto of a bill that would have allowed candidates to receive public matching funds for donations over $250 preserved the $250 limit for the Public Campaign Finance Program as of December 2023.

Summary

Governor Kathy Hochul has exercised her veto power actively, rejecting a significant number of bills passed by the legislature, often citing financial concerns or the desire to maintain alignment with federal policy structures. For instance, she vetoed legislation that would have expanded the scope of the New York LLC Transparency Act beyond the revised federal Corporate Transparency Act definitions, stating she would not impose additional burdens on New York businesses not required by federal law. Conversely, she applauded the veto of the LLC Transparency Act expansion by an advocacy group, which viewed the original act as punitive to small businesses. She also rejected bills like those aimed at funding EMS agencies through property tax cap exemptions or toll relief, citing potential higher property taxes or lack of specific budget allocations.

Her use of the veto pen extends to various policy areas, leading to mixed reactions from different groups. She vetoed bills aimed at increasing transparency, such as those modifying Freedom of Information Law deadlines or weakening the Public Campaign Finance Program, decisions that drew criticism from reform organizations. However, she also vetoed legislation such as a bill that would have mandated two-person crews on subway cars, arguing against mandates that could impact operational costs while stating that current practice was already safe. Her justifications often center on fiscal prudence, claiming many vetoed bills required unbudgeted spending, or that the legislation was technically flawed or duplicative of existing law.

Frequently Asked Questions

Kathy Hochul has used her veto power frequently, vetoing over 140 bills in 2025 alone, which is a high rate compared to some predecessors. She often justifies these actions by citing concerns about the fiscal impact of new spending or maintaining consistency with federal regulations.

Her position on the LLC Transparency Act appears mixed in intent versus execution; she initially championed the law but then vetoed a bill meant to keep its scope broad. She argued the bill she vetoed would create a New York-specific mandate not required by the revised federal law.

When vetoing legislation that creates new spending mandates, such as EMS funding proposals, Kathy Hochul frequently cited a lack of corresponding funding in the state budget. She stated that unplanned expenditures are not in the state's best interest.