Portrait of Stephen Miller
Politician · country
Wikipedia (opens in new tab)

Stephen Miller on Greenland

Pro-Acquisition Stance (strong)

TL;DR

Stephen Miller views the acquisition of Greenland as justifiable based on the world's governing principle of strength and power.

Key Points

  • He asserted that the world is governed by strength, force, and power, justifying the US having rights over territories like Greenland.

  • The suggested path forward involves US officials bypassing Copenhagen to negotiate directly with local Greenlandic leaders for independence from Denmark.

  • The concept mentioned involved offering Greenland a Compact of Free Association, which would cede defense rights to the US in exchange for substantial financial aid.

Summary

Stephen Miller has asserted that the United States possesses the right to take control of Greenland, framing the issue not in terms of international law but of real-world power dynamics. He argues that the world is governed by the "iron laws" of strength, force, and power, implying that possession should follow such principles rather than existing treaties or Danish sovereignty. This position suggests a belief that US strategic interest should supersede current legal arrangements, potentially through direct action or by encouraging Greenland's independence from Denmark to secure a new relationship with the US.

This stance, often tied to the broader theme of American strength on the global stage, suggests an implication for US foreign policy that prioritizes unilateral assertion of dominance over multilateral diplomacy. Furthermore, the discussion around this topic has included the idea that the US could bypass Denmark entirely, perhaps by fostering direct negotiations with Greenlandic leaders or offering a Compact of Free Association model. The assertion is rooted in a worldview where geopolitical control is achieved by exerting demonstrable power.

Frequently Asked Questions

Stephen Miller strongly favors the idea of the United States acquiring Greenland. He views the matter through a lens of international power, arguing that strength dictates control. He suggests the US has a right to the territory based on this power dynamic.

Stephen Miller dismissed conventional legal arguments regarding Denmark's right to Greenland. He stated that in the real world, power and force are the determining factors, not necessarily existing legal frameworks. This implies a belief that might makes right in this geopolitical context.

He has reportedly suggested the US could negotiate directly with Greenlandic leaders to secure their separation from Denmark. Following this, the US could offer a Compact of Free Association deal. This strategy aims to establish American security control over the territory.