Portrait of Robert Fico
Politician · country
Wikipedia (opens in new tab)

Robert Fico on Venezuela

Critic of US intervention (strong)

TL;DR

Robert Fico resolutely rejects the disruption of international law exemplified by US military action in Venezuela.

Key Points

  • He reportedly called the alleged deposition of Nicolas Maduro a “kidnapping” and the “latest American oil adventure.”

  • His position against US force in Venezuela is consistent with his opposition to the Iraq war and denial of Kosovo's sovereignty.

  • He criticized the EU for potential hypocrisy, asking if it would condemn the US action in Venezuela as consistently as it addressed the war in Ukraine.

Summary

Robert Fico clearly stated his position that the alleged United States military action in Venezuela signifies a deepening breakdown of the post-World War II international order. He asserts that international law is being sidelined, with military force being used increasingly without authorization from the UN Security Council, allowing stronger nations to act solely for their own interests. Describing himself as a representative of a small country, he resolutely rejects such disruptions to international law, referencing similar opposition to the Iraq war and the use of Russian military force in Ukraine.

His stance is framed by a commitment to the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries, which he states is a rule he upholds, drawing a parallel between US action in Venezuela and his differing view on Kosovo's creation against international law. Fico questioned the European Union’s consistency in condemning the alleged US action, suggesting it would remain "pharisaical" unless it mirrored the EU's reaction to the war in Ukraine. He champions a foreign policy based on national interest and the pursuit of peaceful cooperation, contrasting this with what he views as the senseless ideological goals he attributes to other EU states regarding the Ukraine conflict.

Frequently Asked Questions

Robert Fico has strongly opposed what he perceived as US military action in Venezuela, viewing it as a violation of international law. He described the alleged action as a disruption to the global order established after World War II. He maintains this critical view, even when meeting with US officials.

Based on his statements, Robert Fico's position appears consistent, linking the alleged US action in Venezuela to past instances where he opposed military force, such as the Iraq war. He frames his stance as rooted in consistent principles of international law and non-interference.

The Prime Minister stated that international law is being disregarded when military power is used without a UN Security Council mandate, citing the situation in Venezuela as an example. He argued that every country has the right to choose its own path and that interference should be avoided.