Commentator · policy

Paul Krugman on Rent Control

Economist opponent (strong)

TL;DR

Paul Krugman views rent control as one of the most uncontroversial economic issues, strongly arguing it reduces housing quantity and quality.

Key Points

  • He cited a 1992 American Economic Association poll indicating 93 percent of members agreed that rent ceilings reduce housing quality and quantity.

  • In a 2000 New York Times column, he used a San Francisco story to illustrate that desperate applicants for an apartment signaled the presence of rent control.

  • He views restrictive housing policies like rent control as compounding the problem of soaring home prices in high-demand, supply-constrained areas like California.

Summary

Paul Krugman has consistently stated that the analysis of rent control is among the best-understood and least controversial topics in economics, often citing the 1992 American Economic Association poll where 93 percent of members agreed that a rent ceiling reduces the quality and quantity of housing. He argues that artificially compressing rents increases demand while simultaneously reducing the quantity of rental units offered, often leading to predictable adverse outcomes like sky-high rents on uncontrolled apartments and a fear among landlords of extended controls, thus stifling new construction.

His position is often framed against the backdrop of housing shortages, where he asserts that crude rent controls worsen the scarcity problem by skewing incentives against new investment and construction. While acknowledging that modern forms of control are more moderate than historical ones, he suggests that any measure suppressing the price message without increasing supply ultimately harms broader affordability. He implies that if society wishes to provide social insurance against rent increases, a direct government subsidy or tax credit would be less economically distortionary than controlling prices for a lucky few tenants.

Frequently Asked Questions

Paul Krugman is a strong opponent of rent control, aligning with what he describes as the consensus among mainstream economists. He argues that rent controls decrease the overall quality and quantity of available housing in the long run.

Based on available sources, Paul Krugman's core position against rent control appears consistent, dating back to at least a 2000 New York Times article. Critics have noted his stance is based on older research, but there is no clear evidence of a recent reversal or evolution of this specific view.

The economist stated that the negative effects of rent control are among the most well-understood issues in economics, comparing it to a basic textbook illustration of supply and demand failure. He maintains that price ceilings distort incentives, leading to shortages and poorer quality housing stock.

Sources8

* This is not an exhaustive list of sources.