Julius Malema on Land Reform
TL;DR
Julius Malema strongly advocates for amending the constitution to allow for land expropriation without compensation to correct historical injustices.
Key Points
He sponsored the motion in the National Assembly on February 27, 2018, calling for the amendment of Section 25 to allow for expropriation without compensation.
He explicitly stated that the time for reconciliation regarding land theft is over and that it is now time for justice, advocating for no payment to those who stole the land.
The EFF leader has insisted that the 'willing-buyer, willing-seller' mechanism is not an acceptable alternative to land redistribution.
Summary
Julius Malema, as the leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), has consistently and vocally demanded the constitutional amendment of Section 25 to permit land expropriation without compensation. His core stance is that this measure is a necessary corrective for historical injustice, asserting that the time for reconciliation regarding land ownership is over and that it is now time for justice. He has argued that the land was stolen by settlers and that the current owners should not be compensated for illegally acquired property, framing the demand as essential for restoring the dignity of the people. This position was formally brought before the National Assembly in February 2018 through a motion he sponsored, which garnered majority support from the ruling party.
This advocacy is positioned as the necessary alternative to the 'willing-buyer, willing-seller' approach, which he and his party reject entirely. The push for expropriation without compensation is also tied to developing food security, with the argument that land redistribution must precede discussions on agricultural production. While his proposals have been met with staunch opposition from other parties concerned about undermining property rights and scaring investors, his rhetoric consistently frames the issue as a non-negotiable path forward to close the historical chapter of dispossession.
Frequently Asked Questions
Julius Malema's position is a strong call for the expropriation of land without compensation, which he views as essential for rectifying historical injustices. He advocates for amending the Constitution to legally enable this process and rejects the current 'willing-buyer, willing-seller' framework. He believes this action is crucial for restoring the dignity of the dispossessed population.
The available information suggests Julius Malema's position has been consistently focused on expropriation without compensation since at least 2017/2018. He presents this as the fixed alternative to reconciliation-based land transfer. There is no indication in the sources of a significant evolution or reversal of this core policy demand.
Julius Malema has vehemently argued against compensating current landowners for land acquired illegally through colonial dispossession. He stated that the EFF does not seek revenge or suffering for the current owners but insists on closing the land question without paying anyone for the stolen land.
Sources4
South African parliament passes motion to expropriate land without compensation | Africanews
National Assembly Debates Motion on Land Expropriation - Parliament of South Africa
Op-ed: Debate Over Land Reform in South Africa's Constitution
Land Reform: South Africa's Burdensome Evergreen - Foreign Policy Association
* This is not an exhaustive list of sources.