Portrait of John Kerry
Politician · event
Wikipedia (opens in new tab)

John Kerry on Iraq War

Opposed post-invasion (strong) Position evolved

TL;DR

John Kerry initially voted to authorize force but strongly criticized the subsequent invasion due to flawed intelligence and execution.

Key Points

  • On October 9, 2002, he voted to give the President authority to use force to disarm Saddam Hussein of WMDs, expecting diplomacy to be prioritized.

  • After the invasion, he strongly criticized the administration, contending that the President misled the country regarding intelligence about weapons of mass destruction.

  • During his 2004 presidential campaign, he stated he would have voted for the authority even without finding WMDs, but opposed the execution of the war.

Summary

John Kerry, as a Senator in 2002, voted in favor of granting the President the authority to use military force in Iraq, based on the premise of disarming Saddam Hussein of weapons of mass destruction. He explicitly tied his vote to the expectation that the administration would exhaust all diplomatic avenues first and act with a broad international coalition. Following the invasion, however, when no WMDs were found, he became a strong critic of the president who led the war, arguing that the administration had misled the country and failed in its execution. He later defended his initial vote by stating he supported the goal of disarming Hussein and that it was a normal Senate move to vote for authority while expecting diplomacy to prevail, though this stance was heavily scrutinized during his 2004 presidential campaign.

His position evolved from authorizing the use of force to a deep critique of the war itself, particularly its handling and the intelligence used to justify it. He maintained that while he supported the initial objective of regime change, the president's decision to rush to war without a comprehensive plan for peace constituted a "failure of diplomacy of a massive order." Critics, especially during his presidential run, pointed to his initial authorization vote, which the opposing campaign framed as a contradiction to his later opposition to the war's execution, calling him a flip-flopper.

Key Quotes

I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.

Frequently Asked Questions

John Kerry initially voted to grant the President the authority to use military force in Iraq on October 9, 2002, according to voting records. He stated this vote was specifically to ensure the disarmament of Saddam Hussein if diplomacy failed. However, he made it clear he expected the administration to exhaust diplomatic avenues and secure a strong international coalition before resorting to force.

Yes, John Kerry's public stance on the Iraq War evolved significantly after the invasion began, as detailed in reports from 2004 and later. While he voted for the initial 2002 resolution authorizing force, he later strongly criticized the decision to go to war based on what he considered faulty intelligence and poor execution by the administration. He often defended his initial vote as backing diplomacy, but his subsequent criticism against the war's handling was robust.

In a May 2003 debate, John Kerry stated that while he would have preferred more diplomacy, he believed it was the right decision to disarm Saddam Hussein and supported the fact that Hussein was disarmed. However, he also criticized the president for rushing to war, asking why the administration proceeded without a plan to win the peace.