· event

Cristina Fernández De Kirchner on Assassination Attempt

Victim of political (strong)

TL;DR

Cristina Fernández de Kirchner views the attempt on her life as an act of political violence fueled by hate speech from opponents.

Key Points

  • She testified in court on August 14, 2024, stating that the material perpetrators were before her, but the intellectual authors and financiers were not.

  • She argued that the event was fueled by a climate of hate speech that had increased significantly in the months leading up to the September 1, 2022, incident.

  • Her legal team highlighted that the investigation into presumed political organizations surrounding the assailants was never deepened during the main trial.

Summary

Cristina Fernández de Kirchner considers the September 1, 2022, assassination attempt, where a man pointed a gun at her face, as a direct result of a crescendo of political violence and hate speech directed against her. During her testimony in the subsequent trial, she asserted that the material authors were present in the courtroom, but the intellectual authors and those who financed the plot remained unaddressed by the initial proceedings. She argued that the attack was connected to the widespread political conflict, especially since she was concurrently facing a corruption trial that spurred frequent demonstrations outside her home.

She also suggested a link between the political climate, which she saw as fueled by hegemonic media and the judicial branch where economic powers concentrate, and the incident, stating that such situations could not arise without that coordination. The former vice president has maintained that while the bullet did not find its mark, the political sentencing against her continued, drawing a parallel between the attempt on her life and her corruption conviction. She further expressed concern that if the climate of hate speech persists, similar acts of violence could happen again against other political figures.

Frequently Asked Questions

Cristina Fernández de Kirchner strongly views the assassination attempt as an act of political violence directly linked to the widespread hate speech and political polarization in the country. She maintained that the attackers were merely the material executors of a larger, uninvestigated plot involving intellectual authors and financial backing from her political opponents.

She stated in court that the material authors of the crime were sitting there, but that the ideological leaders and funders of the plot were not being held accountable. She broke down while recounting the psychological effects the event had on her family, particularly her granddaughter.

Her core stance has remained consistent: that the attack was politically motivated by hate speech against her and her movement. She continues to emphasize the need to uncover who financed and ordered the attempt, rather than just focusing on the man who pulled the trigger.

Sources8

* This is not an exhaustive list of sources.