Politician · policy

Angela Merkel on Nord Stream 2

Pragmatic supporter (strong)

TL;DR

Angela Merkel defended the pipeline as a rational, economically necessary project for German energy security during her tenure.

Key Points

  • She defended the decision to buy Russian gas as rational and understandable for energy security during her chancellorship (2005-2021).

  • Her government backed the parallel Nord Stream 2 pipeline despite strong opposition from Central and Eastern European countries and the United States.

  • In 2018, she acknowledged concerns regarding Ukraine, stating the pipeline was not just an economic project but involved political factors.

Summary

Angela Merkel consistently defended the controversial Nord Stream 2 pipeline project throughout its construction, viewing it primarily through the lens of German economic necessity and energy supply security. She maintained that, from the perspective of the time, acquiring cheaper pipeline gas from Russia was a rational move needed to facilitate Germany's transition away from nuclear and coal power generation. Even while acknowledging that the project was not purely economic and had political factors, especially concerning Ukraine's transit role, she stood by the initial decision to back its completion.

Her support was maintained despite strong opposition from Eastern European nations, the United States, and internal pressure following events like the poisoning of the Russian opposition leader. While construction concluded in 2021, the pipeline never entered service as the subsequent German government halted certification just before the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Since leaving office, she has reiterated that decisions were made based on the circumstances at the time, suggesting that the geopolitical reality drastically shifted post-invasion.

Frequently Asked Questions

Angela Merkel's core position was that the pipeline was a necessary, economically rational project for Germany's energy supply as it phased out nuclear and coal power. She framed the decision as serving German commercial interests during the time the decision was made.

While she consistently supported the project's completion, her acknowledgment that political factors, not just economics, played a role shows a slight evolution in framing, especially concerning Ukraine. However, she never publicly called for its cancellation before leaving office.

After leaving office, the former Chancellor defended her government's decisions regarding Russian gas purchases, stating that one must act based on the time one is in. She noted that the 2022 Russian attack on Ukraine constituted a turning point that necessitated a change in policy by the succeeding government.

Sources6

* This is not an exhaustive list of sources.